State-Level Legal Interpretations

 

1. What is Assembly Bill (AB) 1266? AB 1266, also known as the “School Success and Opportunity Act,” was introduced by Assemblyman Tom Ammiano on February 22, 2013. It requires that pupils be permitted to participate in sex-segregated school programs, activities, and use facilities consistent with their gender identity, without respect to the gender listed in a pupil’s records. AB 1266 was approved by Governor Brown on August 12, 2013. According to Assemblyman Ammiano, “This bill is needed to ensure that transgender students are protected and have the same opportunities to participate and succeed as all other students.” “AB 1266 clarifies California’s student nondiscrimination laws by specifying that all students in K-12 schools must be permitted to participate in school programs, activities, and facilities in accordance with the student’s gender identity.”

As part of the analysis of AB 1266, Assemblyman Ammiano also stated, "Athletics and physical education classes, which are often segregated by sex, provide numerous well-documented positive effects for a student's physical, social, and emotional development. Playing sports can provide student athletes with important lessons about self-discipline, teamwork, success, and failure, as well as the joy and shared excitement that being a member of a sports team can bring. When transgender students are denied the opportunity to participate in physical education classes in a manner consistent with their gender identity, they miss out on these important benefits and suffer from stigmatization and isolation.

In addition, in many cases, students who are transgender are unable to get the credits they need to graduate on time when, for example, they do not have a place to get ready for gym class." 2. When did this law go into effect? AB 1266 became a provision within California Education Code, Section 221.5(f), on January 1, 2014. It is important to note that prior to the enactment of AB 1266, both state and federal law have prohibited gender-based discrimination for some time.

It is the policy of the State of California to afford all persons in public schools, regardless of their disability, gender, gender identity, gender expression, nationality, race or ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, or any other characteristic that is contained in the definition of hate crimes set forth in Section 422.55 of the Penal Code, equal rights and opportunities in the educational institutions of the state. (Education Code Section 200.) No person shall be subjected to discrimination on the basis of disability, gender, gender identity, gender expression, nationality, race or ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, or any other characteristic that is contained in the definition of hate crimes set forth in Section 422.55 of the Penal Code in any program or activity conducted by an educational institution that receives, or benefits from, state financial assistance or enrolls pupils who receive state student financial aid. (Education Code Section 220.)

Pre-existing state law prohibits public schools from discriminating on the basis of several characteristics, including sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity. Preexisting state law also requires that participation in a particular physical education activity or sport, if required of pupils of one sex, be available to pupils of each sex. AB 1266 requires a pupil be permitted to participate in sex-segregated school programs, activities, and facilities including athletic teams and competitions, consistent with his or her gender identity, regardless of the gender listed on the pupil's records.

As amended, Education Code Section 221.5(f) provides that “a pupil shall be permitted to participate in sex-segregated school programs and activities, including athletic teams and competitions, and use facilities consistent with his or her gender identity, irrespective of the gender listed on the pupil’s records.”


Colorado follows state anti-discrimination and civil rights laws and guidance. In 2008, Colorado passed a law (S.B. 08-2000) expanding prohibitions against discrimination. The law calls out the need to protect all regardless of “disability, race, creed, color, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, or ancestry” in all places of public accommodation. This law defines sexual orientation as “a person’s orientation toward heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality or transgender status or another person’s perception thereof.”

In addition, the Colorado Civil Rights Commission issued rules (3 CCR 708-1) that state “All [public] covered entities shall allow individuals the proper use of gender-segregated facilities that are consistent with their gender identity. Gender-segregated facilities include but are not limited to, restrooms, locker rooms, dressing rooms and dormitories.” The term “gender identity” is in turn defined by the rules as follows: “Gender identity” means an innate sense of one’s own gender.” A Colorado court case in 2013 supported the right of a 6 year old transgender student in Fountain School district to use the restroom that aligned with her gender identity.

Colorado law also protects students from bullying. Colorado House Bill 11-1254, section 22-32-109 (1)(11)(I) defines bullying as “any written or verbal expression, or physical or electronic act or gesture, or pattern thereof, that is intended to coerce, intimidate, or cause any physical, mental, or emotional harm to any student” and states that “bullying is prohibited against any student for any reason” (page 9).


This Connecticut law – effective – October 1, 2011 prohibits discrimination on the basis of gender identity or expression in all areas and contexts in which the laws already prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex. This includes the areas of employment, public accommodations, the sale or rental and use of housing, the granting of credit, education and other laws including those over which the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities (CHRO) has jurisdiction. It explicitly authorizes people to file discrimination complaints with the CHRO, which enforces antidiscrimination laws in these areas. CHRO issued a declaratory ruling in 2000 holding that the prohibition against sex discrimination in the laws over which CHRO has jurisdiction, covers discrimination on the basis of gender identity or expression making PA 11-55 a clarification of existing legal obligations.

 
Question: What was CHRO’s declaratory ruling in 2000? 
Answer: In 2000, the CHRO Commissioners issued a declaratory ruling concluding that CHRO has jurisdiction to investigate and process claims of discrimination on the basis of gender identity or expression in employment, public accommodations, housing (the sale, rental or use of property), and the extension of credit, because the status is covered under the prohibition against sex discrimination. Public Act 11-55 codifies this protection against discrimination on the basis of gender identity or expression in the statutes and explicitly authorizes the CHRO to investigate
1 Information regarding the law is presented for general informational purposes only. It should not be used as a substitute for consulting the updated statutes, for obtaining legal advice for specific issues pertaining to a situation or for calling the CHRO or other applicable entity to obtain additional or more specific information on particular questions,
and process complaints of discrimination on the basis of gender identity or expression in these areas, including certain provisions beyond those specifically challenged in the petition leading to the declaratory ruling (such as in education). The act applies the same rules, procedures, and remedies that apply to other types of discrimination complaints, including the right for a complainant to obtain a release of jurisdiction of the state claim to file a lawsuit at court within the applicable statutory timeframes. (See Conn. Gen. Stat. §46a-100 to §46a-102, as amended by Public Act 11-237.)

 
Question: What does “gender identity or expression” mean? 
Answer: The act defines “gender identity or expression” as a person's gender-related identity, appearance, or behavior, whether or not that identity, appearance, or behavior differs from that traditionally associated with the person's physiology or assigned sex at birth. The definition specifies that gender-related identity can be shown by providing evidence in various ways, including (1) medical history, (2) care or treatment of the gender-related identity, (3) consistent and uniform assertion of such an identity, or (4) any other evidence that the identity is sincerely held, part of a person's core identity, or that the person is not asserting such an identity for an improper purpose. Although the law includes these as examples, they need not be shown in every case and are an illustrative list, not an exclusive one. In addition, the list suggests ways that a person’s gender-related identity “can be” shown, not that it must be. The law includes no examples of how a gender-related appearance or behavior may be shown. (See Conn. Gen. Stat. §46a-51(21), as amended by Public Act 11-55.)

 
Question: Are there exceptions to the law? 
Answer: Yes. The act contains a limited religious exception. The act’s prohibition of discrimination on the basis of gender identity or expression does not apply to religious corporations, entities, associations, educational institutions, or societies regarding (1) employment of people to perform work for them or (2) matters of discipline; faith; internal organization; or ecclesiastical rules, customs, or laws that these entities have established.

 
Question: Can penalties be imposed and are damages recoverable when the law is violated? 
Answer: Yes. The act amends Conn. Gen. Stat. §46a-58(a) to include gender identify or expression and makes it a violation to deprive someone of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by state or federal laws or constitutions because of the person's gender identity or expression. Criminal violations can be charged for criminal conduct. See Conn. Gen. Stat. §46a-58 and §53-37, as amended by Public Act 11-55. For example, the act makes it a class D felony for anyone to deprive someone of their rights under this section, based on gender identity or expression, while wearing a mask, hood or other device designed to conceal his or her identity. (See Conn. Gen. Stat. §53-37, as amended by Public Act 11-55.) The act makes it a class A misdemeanor to, on the basis of gender identity or expression, burn crosses or simulations thereof on or place nooses on any public property or on private property without the written consent of the owner. If property is damaged as a result of the conduct this would make the conduct a class D felony. (See Conn. Gen. Stat. §46a-58(e).) Criminal violations are processed by the local and state police departments and prosecuted by the CT State’s Attorney’s Office. 
When a complainant files a discrimination complaint with the CHRO and the case is processed to the point of being adjudicated in the CHRO’s Public Hearing proceedings, the CHRO Human Rights Referee is authorized to order civil penalties for some types of discriminatory conduct. For example, CHRO is authorized to award punitive damages in public accommodations discrimination violations and housing discrimination violations. Conn. Gen. Stat. §46a-64(c) and §46a-64c(g). Courts are also authorized to award punitive damages in some circumstances. (For example, see Conn. Gen. Stat. §46a-89(b) (discriminatory housing or public accommodations practices), §46a-98 (credit) and §46a-98a.) 
In CHRO’s Public Hearing proceedings, the CHRO Human Rights Referee is authorized to order monetary relief and other forms of affirmative relief, equitable and compensatory relief, when the referee determines that unlawful discrimination has occurred. (See Conn. Gen. Stat. §46a-86 et seq.) CHRO can also seek injunctive relief and other applicable relief through the court. (See Conn. Gen. Stat. §46a-89, §46a-89a and §46a-90). 
A person may obtain a release of jurisdiction from the CHRO and file a private action at court. (See Conn. Gen. Stat. §46a-100 to §46a-102, as amended by Public Act 11-237.) The court, ruling on the court case, is authorized to award “legal and equitable relief which it deems appropriate including, but not limited to, temporary or permanent injunctive relief, attorney’s fees and court costs.” (See Conn. Gen. Stat. §46a-104.)

 
Question: Are students in public schools protected by this law? 
Answer: Yes. The act requires public schools to be open to all children and to give them an equal opportunity to participate in school activities, programs, and courses of study without discrimination on account of gender identity or expression. (See Conn. Gen. Stat. §10-15c and §10a-6(b), as amended by Public Act 11-55.2) This act adds protections to the antidiscrimination statues in education similar to Public Act 97-247: An Act Concerning Revisions To The Education Statutes. Public Act 97-247, which added protection against discrimination based on sexual orientation to the list of kinds of discrimination prohibited against students in public schools. The other protected statuses are race, color, sex, religion and national origin. (See Conn. Gen. Stat. §10-15c, as amended by Public Act 11-55.) 
Public Act 11-55 also prohibits boards of education from discriminating on the basis of gender identity or expression in employing or paying teachers. (See Conn. Gen. Stat. §10-153, as amended by Public Act 11-55.) 
2 Also, see Public Act 11-232, An Act Concerning the Strengthening of School Bullying Laws. 3
Further under existing law, it is a discriminatory practice for anyone to deprive another person of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by Connecticut or federal laws or constitutions, or cause such a deprivation, because of religion, national origin, alienage, color, race, sex, sexual orientation, blindness, or physical disability. The act adds gender identity or expression to this list. By doing so, and by prohibiting discrimination against students on the basis of gender identity or expression in public schools with respect to activities, programs, and courses of study, the act authorizes CHRO to investigate claims of discrimination against students on the basis of gender identity or expression by public schools. 


State law (§§368-1, 489-2, and 489-3, Hawai`i Revised Statutes) which protects individuals from discrimination based on gender identity or expression in public accommodations, employment, housing, and access to services receiving state financial assistance.

• Title 8, Chapter 19 of the Hawai`i Administrative Rules which includes a prohibition against making verbal or non-verbal expressions that cause others to feel uncomfortable, pressured, threatened, or in danger because of reasons that include gender identity and expression.

In addition, the Hawai`i Department of Education’s mission is to develop the academic achievement, character, and social-emotional well-being of every child. The State needs to support all students in the development of their identities. Several Board of Education policies support this mission, including: • Policy E-3, Na Hopena A‘o: “The DOE works together as a system that includes everyone in the broader community to develop competencies that strengthen a sense of belonging, responsibility, excellence, aloha, total wellbeing and Hawaii.”

 • Policy 101.1, Student Code of Conduct: “Students are expected to be honest, behave with dignity and treat others with respect and courtesy. Behavior of the individual should not interfere with the rights of others. This includes the use of appropriate language, actions and attire. Students are expected not to harass others through any means.”

• Policy 101.6, Comprehensive Student Support System: “The BOE recognizes the importance of providing effective instruction in a safe, positive, caring and supportive learning environment…The DOE shall provide a comprehensive student support system framework to support the implementation, with fidelity of […] appropriate student support through an array of services.”

• Policy 106.5, Focus on Students: “The focus on the educational program for the public schools of Hawaii shall focus on the growth and development of each student.”

• Policy 305.10, Anti-Harassment, Anti-Bullying, and Anti-Discrimination Against Students by Employees: “The DOE strictly prohibits any form of harassment and/or bullying based on the following: gender identity and expression, socio economic status, physical appearance and characteristics and sexual orientation.” “A student shall not be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of or otherwise be subjected to harassment, bullying and discrimination under any program, services or activity of the DOE.”

Title 8, Chapter 6 of the Hawai`i Administrative Rules governs the confidentiality of personal records, including those of students.

• Title 8, Chapter 34 of the Hawai`i Administrative Rules governs the protection of the educational rights and privacy of students and parents.

• BOE Policy 500.21, Student Information and Confidential Records: “Information relating to individual students or former students in the public schools shall not be divulged or released by the Department of Education (Department) personnel, except as authorized by the individual student, parent, or guardian, permitted by the Department, or specified by law. Reports designated as “confidential” contain information of an intimate and personal nature, and shall be safeguarded and respected in accordance with professional ethics. Such reports shall not be placed in files of general accessibility. […] All public schools shall maintain individual files of permanent student records as required by the Department or by law.”


The Commission’s Education Rule, which is a joint rule enacted with the Department of Education, has not been updated in any significant way in the past 15 years. Even the most recent amendment, enacted in 2000, did not amend the rule to include all of the then-protected classes which had been added to the MHRA: while race, national origin, and disability had been added to the education provisions in the late 1980s, those classes are not mentioned in our current rule. Ten years ago, the education provisions of the MHRA were amended to make discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation (which includes gender identity and gender expression) unlawful. Soon thereafter, the Commission applied the sexual orientation protections in a claim by a transgender student’s right to use the bathroom corresponding with her gender identity. The case became the subject of long-running litigation around the application of the MHRA’s sexual orientation provisions in education. Because of the litigation, the Commission held off on rulemaking. The litigation was finally concluded about two years ago. See Doe v. RSU 26, 2014 ME 11. In the wake of Doe, we received a number of inquiries about the rights of students under the MHRA, specifically with regard to sexual orientation issues.

While we would like to propose changes to the current Education Rule, that avenue is unavailable at the moment. The public is in need of guidance as to the application of the education provisions of the MHRA generally, and how the Commission interprets the Act with regard to sexual orientation discrimination in particular. Those issues are addressed below.


Maryland Education Code, Annotated Title 7 Public Schools, Subtitle 4, Health and Safety of Students §7-424 Requires reporting incidents of harassment or intimidation against students. Defines bullying, harassment, or intimidation as intentional conduct, including verbal, physical or written, or an intentional electronic communication that creates a hostile educational environment by substantially interfering with a student’s educational benefits, opportunities, or performance, or with a student’s physical or psychological well-being and is: (1) motivated by an actual or perceived personal characteristic including race, national origin, marital status, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, religion, ancestry, physical attributes, socioeconomic status, familial status, or physical or mental ability or disability; or (2) threatening or seriously intimidating. The incident must: (1) occur on school property, at a school activity or event, or on a school bus; or (2) substantially disrupt the orderly operation of a school.

10/27/2015 Page 17 Code of Maryland Regulations, COMAR 13.A.01.04.03 Public School Standards, School Safety All students in Maryland’s public schools, without exception and regardless of race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, language, socioeconomic status, age or disability, have the right to education environments that are safe, appropriate for academic achievement, and free from any form of harassment. Md. Code Ann., Health-Gen §4-211. Vital Records-New Certificates of Birth-Sex Change or Diagnosis of an Intersex Condition. As of October 1, 2015 individuals can update the sex listed on their birth certificate by submitting a letter to Maryland Vital Records from a licensed health care practitioner stating that the individual has had appropriate clinical treatment for gender transition or has been diagnosed with an intersex condition.


An Act Relative to Gender Identity (Chapter 199 of the Acts of 2011),1 which became effective on July 1, 2012, amended several Massachusetts statutes prohibiting discrimination on the basis of specified categories, to include discrimination on the basis of gender identity. Among the statutes amended is G.L. c. 76, § 5, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of gender identity against students who enroll in or attend the public schools. G.L. c. 76, §5 now reads as follows: Every person shall have a right to attend the public schools of the town where he actually resides, subject to the following section. No school committee is required to enroll a person who does not actually reside in the town unless said enrollment is authorized by law or by the school committee. Any person who violates or assists in the violation of this provision may be required to remit full restitution to the town of the improperly-attended public schools. No person shall be excluded from or discriminated against in admission to a public school of any town, or in obtaining the advantages, privileges and courses of study of such public school on account of race, color, sex, gender identity, religion, national origin or sexual orientation. (Emphasis added)

In June 2012, the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (Board) adopted revised Access to Equal Education Opportunity Regulations, 603 CMR 26.00, and Charter School Regulations, 603 CMR 1.00, to reflect the broadened student anti-discrimination provision in G.L. c. 76, §5. The Board also directed the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (Department) to provide guidance to school districts to assist in implementing the gender identity provision.

The gender identity law amended G.L. c. 76, § 5,2 to establish that no person shall be excluded from or discriminated against in admission to a public school of any town, or in obtaining the advantages, privileges and courses of study of such public school on account of gender identity, among other characteristics. The amended Access to Equal Educational Opportunity regulations, 603 CMR 26.00, and the non-discrimination provision of the Charter School 2 The Act amends several other statutes as well, including G.L. c. 151B (governing nondiscrimination in employment), to prohibit discrimination on the basis of gender identity.

Regulations, 603 CMR 1.00, require schools to establish policies and procedures, provide training, and implement and monitor practices to ensure that obstacles to equal access to school programs are removed for all students, including transgender and gender nonconforming students. All districts and schools should review existing policies, handbooks, and other written materials to ensure that they are updated to reflect the new law. At a minimum, this means including the category of “gender identity” within the identification of legally protected characteristics. For example:

Public Schools strives to provide a safe, respectful, and supportive learning environment in which all students can thrive and succeed in its schools. The [ The [ ] Public Schools prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex, gender identity, religion, national origin, or sexual orientation and ensures that all students have equal rights of access and equal enjoyment of the opportunities, advantages, privileges, and courses of study.


The Minnesota Human Rights Act (https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=363a) prohibits discrimination and harassment in education based on gender expression, actual or perceived gender identity and actual or perceived sexual orientation.9 Minnesota law provides that all students have the right to attend school in a safe and supportive environment where they can learn and have equal access to all educational opportunities.10 Illegal discrimination can occur if a student is expressly denied full utilization of a benefit at school, is indirectly denied full utilization of a benefit at school due to a policy, practice or procedure of the school or if a student is exposed to a hostile environment that interferes with the student’s ability to learn or participate in activities at school.

The Safe and Supportive Minnesota Schools Act11 (https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=363a) prohibits bullying and harassment of all students, including bullying and harassment of students based on gender expression, actual or perceived gender identity and actual or perceived sexual orientation. Under the Safe and Supportive Minnesota Schools Act, public school districts and charter schools are required to adopt a policy that prohibits bullying and harassment of all students, including bullying and harassment based on sex, gender identity, gender expression and sexual orientation.12 Bullying may also rise to the level of a discriminatory hostile educational environment under Title IX or the Minnesota Human Rights Act.


New York State Education Law § 3201-a prohibits discrimination based on sex with respect to admission into or inclusion in courses of instruction and athletic teams in public schools.2 Furthermore, DASA specifically provides that “no student shall be subjected to harassment or bullying by employees or students on school property or at a school function; nor shall any student be subjected to discrimination based on a person's actual or perceived race, color, weight, national origin, ethnic group, religion, religious practice, disability, sexual orientation, gender (including gender identity or expression), or sex by school employees or students on school property or at a school function.”3 DASA includes gender as a protected category and defines gender as “a person’s actual or perceived sex and includes a person’s gender expression.”


Under Oregon law, “[a] person may not be subjected to discrimination in any public elementary, secondary or community college education program or service, school or interschool activity or in any higher education program or service, school or interschool activity where the program, service, school or activity is financed in whole or in part by moneys appropriated by the Legislative Assembly.”1 Discrimination includes “any act that unreasonably differentiates treatment, intended or unintended, or any act that is fair in form but discriminatory in operation, either of which is based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, national origin, marital status, age or disability.”2 Oregon law broadly defines, “sexual orientation” as an individual’s actual or perceived heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality or gender identity, regardless of whether the individual’s gender identity, appearance, expression or behavior differs from that traditionally associated with the individual’s sex at birth.

Under Oregon law, school districts are required to provide a free appropriate public education to all students who are resident within the district. 12 Students “may not be subjected to discrimination in any public elementary, secondary or community college education program or service, school or interschool activity or in any higher education program or service, school or interschool activity where the program, service, school or activity is financed in whole or in part by moneys appropriated by the Legislative Assembly.”13 Discrimination includes “any act that unreasonably differentiates treatment, intended or unintended, or any act that is fair in form but discriminatory in operation, either of which is based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, national origin, marital status, age or disability.”14 “Sexual orientation means an individual’s actual or perceived heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality or gender identity, regardless of whether the individual’s gender identity, appearance, expression or behavior differs from that traditionally associated with the individual’s sex at birth.

As cited previously in this document Oregon state law prohibits discrimination by public education providers based on an “individual’s actual or perceived heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality or gender identity, regardless of whether the individual’s gender identity, appearance, expression or behavior differs from that traditionally associated with the individual’s sex at birth.”26 While we are unaware of any Oregon court cases which have interpreted this language, courts from other states have ruled on similar language from their own state laws and have found that this language provides protections for transgender students including the use of a bathroom consistent with the student’s gender identity.

Oregon law requires all school districts to “adopt a policy prohibiting harassment, intimidation or bullying and prohibiting cyberbullying.” 30 This policy must require school district employees to report acts of harassment, intimidation or bullying or an act of cyberbullying to a person identified by the district.31 This includes harassment, intimidation or bullying against transgender students. Under Oregon law ,“harassment, intimidation or bullying” means any act that: (a) ) Substantially interferes with a student’s educational benefits, opportunities

or performance; (b) Takes place on or immediately adjacent to school grounds, at any school- sponsored activity, on school-provided transportation or at any official school bus stop; (c) Has the effect of: (A) Physically harming a student or damaging a student’s property; (B) Knowingly placing a student in reasonable fear of physical harm to the student or damage to the student’s property; or (C) Creating a hostile educational environment, including interfering with the psychological well-being of a student; and (d) May be based on, but not be limited to, the protected class status of a person.32

Oregon law goes on to define “protected class” as a group of persons distinguished, or perceived to be distinguished, by race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, national origin, marital status, familial status, source of income or disability.33 28 ORS 659.850(2). 29 18 Jaime M. Grant, et al., National Center for Transgender Equality and National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, Injustice at Every Turn: A Report of the National Transgender Discrimination Survey, 3, 45 (2011). http://www.thetaskforce.org/downloads/reports/reports/ntds_full.pdf

30 ORS 339.356 31 ORS 339.356 32 ORS 339.351 33 ORS 339.351 12 Required school district policies must include how the district will publicize the policy within the district including making it readily available to parents, school employees, students and others. 34 School district employees and parents should work together to resolve complaints alleging harassment, bullying or intimidation based on a student’s actual or perceived gender identity or expression.

Oregon law requires all school districts to “adopt a policy prohibiting harassment, intimidation or bullying and prohibiting cyberbullying.” 30 This policy must require school district employees to report acts of harassment, intimidation or bullying or an act of cyberbullying to a person identified by the district.31 This includes harassment, intimidation or bullying against transgender students. Under Oregon law ,“harassment, intimidation or bullying” means any act that: (a) ) Substantially interferes with a student’s educational benefits, opportunities

or performance; (b) Takes place on or immediately adjacent to school grounds, at any school- sponsored activity, on school-provided transportation or at any official school bus stop; (c) Has the effect of: (A) Physically harming a student or damaging a student’s property; (B) Knowingly placing a student in reasonable fear of physical harm to the student or damage to the student’s property; or (C) Creating a hostile educational environment, including interfering with the psychological well-being of a student; and (d) May be based on, but not be limited to, the protected class status of a person.32

Oregon law goes on to define “protected class” as a group of persons distinguished, or perceived to be distinguished, by race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, national origin, marital status, familial status, source of income or disability.33 28 ORS 659.850(2). 29 18 Jaime M. Grant, et al., National Center for Transgender Equality and National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, Injustice at Every Turn: A Report of the National Transgender Discrimination Survey, 3, 45 (2011). http://www.thetaskforce.org/downloads/reports/reports/ntds_full.pdf

30 ORS 339.356 31 ORS 339.356 32 ORS 339.351 33 ORS 339.351 12 Required school district policies must include how the district will publicize the policy within the district including making it readily available to parents, school employees, students and others. 34 School district employees and parents should work together to resolve complaints alleging harassment, bullying or intimidation based on a student’s actual or perceived gender identity or expression.


In December 2010, The Rhode Island Board of Regents revised its Policy Statement on Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity/Expression which includes the following language: The Rhode Island Board of Regents for Elementary and Secondary Education recognizes that all educational agencies must provide all people and groups with full access to educational opportunities and barriers to student participation based on sexual orientation or gender identity/expression must be identified and removed. The Board also recognizes that all students, without exception, have the right to attend a school in which they feel safe and able to express their identity without fear.

Article I, Section 2 of the Rhode Island Constitution states in part that “No otherwise qualified person shall, solely by reason of race, gender or handicap be June, 2016 Page 3 subject to discrimination by the state, its agents or any person or entity doing business with the state.” RIGL §11-24-2 Discriminatory practices prohibited. In May, 2001, Rhode Island became the second state in the country to explicitly prohibit discrimination on the basis of gender identity or expression, thereby protecting transgender people from discrimination in employment, housing, credit, and public accommodations (R.I. Pub. L. 2001, ch. 340). The law defines gender identity or expression as including a person’s “actual or perceived gender, as well as a person’s gender identity, gender-related self-image, gender-related appearance, or gender-related expression, whether or not that gender identity is different from that traditionally associated with the person’s sex at birth.” R.I. Gen. Laws, §§ 28-5-6 (employment); 34-37-3 (housing); 11-24-2.1 (public accommodations).

RIGL §16-38-1.1 Discrimination because of sex states in part that “Discrimination on the basis of sex is hereby prohibited in all public elementary and secondary schools in the state . . .” The state statute is essentially a restatement of the federal Title IX. RIGL§16-71-3 Educational records access and review rights-Confidentiality of records, similar to FERPA, safeguards the right of privacy of student education records. It applies only to public schools. RIGL §16-2-17 Right to a safe school asserts that each student, staff member, teacher, and administrator has a right to attend and/or work at a school which is safe and secure, and which is conducive to learning, and which is free from the threat, actual or implied, of physical harm by a disruptive student.

RIGL §16-21-34 Safe Schools Act and the RI Statewide Bullying Policy, recognize that the bullying of a student creates a climate of fear and disrespect that can seriously impair the student's health and negatively affect learning. Bullying undermines the safe learning environment that students need to achieve their full potential. The expression, physical act or gesture may include, but is not limited to, an incident or incidents that may be reasonably perceived as being motivated by characteristics such as race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression or mental, physical, or sensory disability, intellectual ability or by any other distinguishing characteristic. The purpose of the policy is to ensure a consistent and unified statewide approach to the prohibition of bullying at school.


State Policy It is the policy of the State of Vermont that all Vermont educational institutions provide safe, orderly, civil, and positive learning environments. Harassment, hazing and bullying have no place and will not be tolerated in Vermont schools. No Vermont student should feel threatened or be discriminated against while enrolled in a Vermont school. 16 V.S.A. § 570. State Law An owner or operator of a place of public accommodation or an agent or employee of such owner or operator shall not, because of race, creed, color, national origin, marital status, sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity of any person, refuse, withhold from, or deny to that person any of the accommodations, advantages, facilities, and privileges of the place of public accommodation. 9 V.S. A. § 4502(a).

Discrimination/Harassment Harassment of a student on the basis of sex can limit or prevent a student from participating in or receiving educational benefits, services or opportunities. Gender-based harassment may include acts of verbal, nonverbal, or physical aggression, intimidation, or hostility based on sex or sex stereotyping. For example, harassing a student for failing to conform to stereotypical masculine or feminine notions or behaviors constitutes sex discrimination. Complaints alleging discrimination or harassment based on a person’s actual or perceived transgender status, gender identity or gender nonconformity should be handled in accordance with the Policy on the Prevention of Harassment, Hazing and Bullying of Students. Schools are required to adopt a policy for the prevention of harassment as least as stringent at the Secretary of Education’s model policy. 16 V.S.A. § 570(b). The Secretary’s model policy can be found here:

http://education.vermont.gov/student-support/healthy-and-safe-schools/school-climate#hhbmodel-policy Vermont law defines harassment at 16 V.S.A. §11a(26(A): “Harassment” means an incident or incidents of verbal, written, visual, or physical conduct, including any incident conducted by electronic means, based on or motivated by a student’s or a student’s family member’s actual or perceived race, creed, color, national origin, marital status, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or disability that has the purpose or effect of objectively and substantially undermining and detracting from or interfering with a student’s educational performance or access to school resources or creating an objectively intimidating, hostile, or offensive environment.


Civil rights laws prohibit discrimination and discriminatory harassment on the basis of gender expression and gender identity in Washington public schools. Chapter 28A.642 RCW | Chapter 392­190 WAC | Chapter 49.60 RCW